Russian Federation vs Tunisia: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Russian Federation
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 6.22 kg/ha against 5.91 kg/ha in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.31 kg/ha.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Russian Federation's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 136th and Tunisia ranks 134th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.84 kg/ha | 4.16 kg/ha | 1.69 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 4.03 kg/ha | 4.47 kg/ha | 0.4372 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 4.75 kg/ha | 5.31 kg/ha | 0.5569 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 5.91 kg/ha | 5.69 kg/ha | 0.2204 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Russian Federation or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 6.22 kg/ha against 5.91 kg/ha in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Russian Federation and Tunisia?
- 0.31 kg/ha, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Tunisia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Russian Federation and Tunisia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Russian Federation ranks 136th and Tunisia ranks 134th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).