Serbia vs Uruguay: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Serbia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 24.03 kg/ha against 22.43 kg/ha in Serbia, a difference of 1.6 kg/ha.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 45th and Uruguay ranks 42nd of 201 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.86 kg/ha | 26.78 kg/ha | 9.91 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 18.12 kg/ha | 27.32 kg/ha | 9.21 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 20.48 kg/ha | 28.58 kg/ha | 8.1 kg/ha | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Serbia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 24.03 kg/ha against 22.43 kg/ha in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Serbia and Uruguay?
- 1.6 kg/ha, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Uruguay?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Uruguay rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Serbia ranks 45th and Uruguay ranks 42nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).