Slovakia vs Sweden: Input β Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input β Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Slovakia
- Sweden
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 11.41 kg/ha against 11.24 kg/ha in Sweden, a difference of 0.17 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Sweden ahead.
Slovakia ranks 95th and Sweden ranks 96th of 201 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.46 kg/ha | 16.03 kg/ha | 1.57 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2000s | 13.15 kg/ha | 13.19 kg/ha | 0.0441 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2010s | 12.11 kg/ha | 12.36 kg/ha | 0.2494 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2020s | 12.04 kg/ha | 12.4 kg/ha | 0.3604 kg/ha | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input β cropland phosphorus per unit area, Slovakia or Sweden?
- Slovakia, at 11.41 kg/ha against 11.24 kg/ha in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input β cropland phosphorus per unit area between Slovakia and Sweden?
- 0.17 kg/ha, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Sweden?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Slovakia and Sweden rank globally for input β cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Slovakia ranks 95th and Sweden ranks 96th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input β Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).