Afghanistan vs Honduras: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Afghanistan
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 23,618 t against 22,929 t in Afghanistan, a difference of 689 t.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 87th and Honduras ranks 86th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 4 and Honduras in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11,808 t | 5,366 t | 6,442 t | Afghanistan |
| 1970s | 16,581 t | 6,537 t | 10,044 t | Afghanistan |
| 1980s | 16,205 t | 6,871 t | 9,335 t | Afghanistan |
| 1990s | 11,027 t | 11,579 t | 551.83 t | Honduras |
| 2000s | 13,005 t | 12,893 t | 112.05 t | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 18,834 t | 20,641 t | 1,807 t | Honduras |
| 2020s | 21,417 t | 22,816 t | 1,399 t | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Afghanistan or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 23,618 t against 22,929 t in Afghanistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Afghanistan and Honduras?
- 689 t, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Honduras?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Honduras rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Afghanistan ranks 87th and Honduras ranks 86th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).