Argentina vs Mexico: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Argentina
- Mexico
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 333,319 t against 299,914 t in Mexico, a difference of 33,405 t.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.
Argentina ranks 11th and Mexico ranks 14th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Mexico in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 42,289 t | 77,266 t | 34,977 t | Mexico |
| 1970s | 53,339 t | 147,102 t | 93,763 t | Mexico |
| 1980s | 60,979 t | 236,220 t | 175,240 t | Mexico |
| 1990s | 112,363 t | 207,350 t | 94,987 t | Mexico |
| 2000s | 214,880 t | 217,973 t | 3,094 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 299,150 t | 256,202 t | 42,947 t | Argentina |
| 2020s | 373,491 t | 292,919 t | 80,572 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Argentina or Mexico?
- Argentina, at 333,319 t against 299,914 t in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Argentina and Mexico?
- 33,405 t, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Mexico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Mexico rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Argentina ranks 11th and Mexico ranks 14th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).