Armenia vs Liberia: Input — Cropland phosphorus

Armenia
1,536 t
in 2023
Liberia
1,927 t
in 2023
Armenia rank
154th
Liberia rank
151st

Input — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Armenia
  • Liberia
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 1,927 t against 1,536 t in Armenia, a difference of 391 t.

That makes Liberia's figure about 1.3 times Armenia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 154th and Liberia ranks 151st of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Liberia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Liberia Difference Ahead
1990s 2,403 t 730.97 t 1,672 t Armenia
2000s 1,197 t 1,031 t 165.53 t Armenia
2010s 1,491 t 1,921 t 430.09 t Liberia
2020s 1,687 t 2,040 t 353.57 t Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Armenia or Liberia?
Liberia, at 1,927 t against 1,536 t in Armenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Armenia and Liberia?
391 t, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Liberia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Armenia and Liberia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
Armenia ranks 154th and Liberia ranks 151st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).