Australia and New Zealand vs Democratic People's Republic of Korea: Input — Cropland phosphorus

Australia and New Zealand
316,792 t
in 2023
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
26,671 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
12th
Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank
12th

Input — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 316,792 t against 26,671 t in Democratic People's Republic of Korea, a difference of 290,121 t.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 11.9 times Democratic People's Republic of Korea's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 12th of 186 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Democratic People's Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 276,703 t 29,331 t 247,372 t Australia and New Zealand
1970s 293,076 t 56,878 t 236,198 t Australia and New Zealand
1980s 280,263 t 71,128 t 209,135 t Australia and New Zealand
1990s 314,039 t 40,979 t 273,060 t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 351,708 t 22,580 t 329,128 t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 319,753 t 17,844 t 301,909 t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 356,176 t 17,309 t 338,867 t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Australia and New Zealand or Democratic People's Republic of Korea?
Australia and New Zealand, at 316,792 t against 26,671 t in Democratic People's Republic of Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Australia and New Zealand and Democratic People's Republic of Korea?
290,121 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Democratic People's Republic of Korea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 12th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Democratic People's Republic of Korea: Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-phosphorus/australia-and-new-zealand/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-phosphorus/australia-and-new-zealand/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/">Australia and New Zealand vs Democratic People's Republic of Korea: Input — Cropland phosphorus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).