Azerbaijan vs Madagascar: Input — Cropland phosphorus

Azerbaijan
14,555 t
in 2023
Madagascar
14,508 t
in 2023
Azerbaijan rank
104th
Madagascar rank
105th

Input — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Madagascar
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 14,555 t against 14,508 t in Madagascar, a difference of 47 t.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 104th and Madagascar ranks 105th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Madagascar Difference Ahead
1990s 6,498 t 10,768 t 4,270 t Madagascar
2000s 4,237 t 8,652 t 4,415 t Madagascar
2010s 10,066 t 11,910 t 1,844 t Madagascar
2020s 15,791 t 14,098 t 1,693 t Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Azerbaijan or Madagascar?
Azerbaijan, at 14,555 t against 14,508 t in Madagascar as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Azerbaijan and Madagascar?
47 t, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Madagascar?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Azerbaijan and Madagascar rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
Azerbaijan ranks 104th and Madagascar ranks 105th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).