Azerbaijan vs Nicaragua: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Azerbaijan
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 14,630 t against 14,555 t in Azerbaijan, a difference of 75 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 104th and Nicaragua ranks 103rd of 201 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,498 t | 7,322 t | 823.92 t | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 4,237 t | 12,047 t | 7,810 t | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 10,066 t | 15,146 t | 5,081 t | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 15,791 t | 16,492 t | 701.01 t | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Azerbaijan or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 14,630 t against 14,555 t in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Azerbaijan and Nicaragua?
- 75 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Nicaragua?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Nicaragua rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Azerbaijan ranks 104th and Nicaragua ranks 103rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).