Bangladesh vs Pakistan: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Bangladesh
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 666,802 t against 510,253 t in Bangladesh, a difference of 156,549 t.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.3 times Bangladesh's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 10th and Pakistan ranks 7th of 201 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 33,148 t | 37,880 t | 4,732 t | Pakistan |
| 1970s | 58,556 t | 86,839 t | 28,282 t | Pakistan |
| 1980s | 99,041 t | 195,341 t | 96,300 t | Pakistan |
| 1990s | 114,123 t | 284,776 t | 170,653 t | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 154,906 t | 430,964 t | 276,058 t | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 306,747 t | 584,606 t | 277,858 t | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 496,209 t | 657,154 t | 160,945 t | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Bangladesh or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 666,802 t against 510,253 t in Bangladesh as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Bangladesh and Pakistan?
- 156,549 t, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Pakistan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Pakistan rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Bangladesh ranks 10th and Pakistan ranks 7th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).