Barbados vs New Caledonia: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Barbados
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 420.02 t against 412.11 t in New Caledonia, a difference of 7.91 t.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Barbados ranks 171st and New Caledonia ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 4 and New Caledonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 244.17 t | 281.21 t | 37.04 t | New Caledonia |
| 1970s | 511.41 t | 271.47 t | 239.94 t | Barbados |
| 1980s | 685.74 t | 338.03 t | 347.7 t | Barbados |
| 1990s | 388.47 t | 539.33 t | 150.86 t | New Caledonia |
| 2000s | 407.76 t | 461.41 t | 53.65 t | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 477.35 t | 400.07 t | 77.28 t | Barbados |
| 2020s | 438.22 t | 414.73 t | 23.49 t | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Barbados or New Caledonia?
- Barbados, at 420.02 t against 412.11 t in New Caledonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Barbados and New Caledonia?
- 7.91 t, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and New Caledonia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and New Caledonia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Barbados ranks 171st and New Caledonia ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).