Belarus vs Nigeria: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Belarus
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 100,768 t against 92,833 t in Belarus, a difference of 7,935 t.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 39th and Nigeria ranks 37th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Nigeria in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 103,190 t | 71,788 t | 31,402 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 95,614 t | 73,805 t | 21,809 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 112,573 t | 96,728 t | 15,845 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 89,384 t | 112,001 t | 22,617 t | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Belarus or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 100,768 t against 92,833 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Belarus and Nigeria?
- 7,935 t, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nigeria?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Nigeria rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Belarus ranks 39th and Nigeria ranks 37th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).