Belarus vs Sudan (former): Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Belarus
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 92,833 t against 90,766 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 2,067 t.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 39th and Sudan (former) ranks 40th of 201 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 103,190 t | 27,371 t | 75,819 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 95,614 t | 33,732 t | 61,881 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 151,230 t | 91,067 t | 60,164 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Belarus or Sudan (former)?
- Belarus, at 92,833 t against 90,766 t in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Belarus and Sudan (former)?
- 2,067 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sudan (former)?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Belarus and Sudan (former) rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Belarus ranks 39th and Sudan (former) ranks 40th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).