Belgium vs Côte d'Ivoire: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Belgium
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 35,144 t against 34,291 t in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 853 t.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 65th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 67th of 201 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49,784 t | 10,486 t | 39,298 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 40,428 t | 19,976 t | 20,452 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 37,303 t | 27,703 t | 9,600 t | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Belgium or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Belgium, at 35,144 t against 34,291 t in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Belgium and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 853 t, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Belgium ranks 65th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 67th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).