Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Estonia: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Estonia
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 8,446 t against 7,082 t in Estonia, a difference of 1,364 t.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.2 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 112th and Estonia ranks 114th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,023 t | 9,403 t | 379.78 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 11,063 t | 6,454 t | 4,609 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 11,793 t | 7,920 t | 3,873 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 9,340 t | 8,613 t | 727.28 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Estonia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 8,446 t against 7,082 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Estonia?
- 1,364 t, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Estonia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 112th and Estonia ranks 114th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).