Botswana vs Iceland: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Botswana
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 2,015 t against 1,807 t in Botswana, a difference of 208 t.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 152nd and Iceland ranks 150th of 201 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 508.65 t | 3,193 t | 2,684 t | Iceland |
| 1970s | 984.41 t | 4,257 t | 3,272 t | Iceland |
| 1980s | 951.41 t | 4,119 t | 3,167 t | Iceland |
| 1990s | 719.73 t | 3,147 t | 2,427 t | Iceland |
| 2000s | 791.24 t | 2,844 t | 2,053 t | Iceland |
| 2010s | 902.52 t | 3,308 t | 2,405 t | Iceland |
| 2020s | 1,262 t | 2,566 t | 1,304 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Botswana or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 2,015 t against 1,807 t in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Botswana and Iceland?
- 208 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Iceland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Iceland rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Botswana ranks 152nd and Iceland ranks 150th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).