Burkina Faso vs Burundi: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Burkina Faso
- Burundi
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 26,626 t against 24,611 t in Burundi, a difference of 2,015 t.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 82nd and Burundi ranks 84th of 201 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Burundi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,716 t | 400.41 t | 1,316 t | Burkina Faso |
| 1970s | 2,614 t | 670.16 t | 1,944 t | Burkina Faso |
| 1980s | 5,445 t | 1,115 t | 4,330 t | Burkina Faso |
| 1990s | 9,979 t | 1,552 t | 8,427 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 16,124 t | 1,304 t | 14,820 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 22,555 t | 5,036 t | 17,519 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 22,822 t | 17,733 t | 5,089 t | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Burkina Faso or Burundi?
- Burkina Faso, at 26,626 t against 24,611 t in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Burkina Faso and Burundi?
- 2,015 t, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Burundi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Burundi rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Burkina Faso ranks 82nd and Burundi ranks 84th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).