Cabo Verde vs Malaysia: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cabo Verde
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 118,401 t against 320.71 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 118,080 t.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 369.2 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Malaysia ranks 31st of 29 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 79 t | 23,208 t | 23,129 t | Malaysia |
| 1970s | 111.67 t | 36,423 t | 36,311 t | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 269.58 t | 66,766 t | 66,496 t | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 654.64 t | 97,246 t | 96,592 t | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 541.43 t | 103,842 t | 103,300 t | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 359.64 t | 135,159 t | 134,799 t | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 318.37 t | 122,136 t | 121,817 t | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Cabo Verde or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 118,401 t against 320.71 t in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Cabo Verde and Malaysia?
- 118,080 t, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Malaysia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Malaysia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Malaysia ranks 31st of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).