Cambodia vs Saudi Arabia: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cambodia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 38,076 t against 35,800 t in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 2,276 t.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 56th and Saudi Arabia ranks 59th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11,350 t | 1,153 t | 10,197 t | Cambodia |
| 1970s | 10,137 t | 1,549 t | 8,588 t | Cambodia |
| 1980s | 10,803 t | 52,134 t | 41,331 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 1990s | 17,453 t | 72,005 t | 54,552 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 27,636 t | 57,112 t | 29,476 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 31,026 t | 44,402 t | 13,376 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 39,419 t | 38,197 t | 1,222 t | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Cambodia or Saudi Arabia?
- Cambodia, at 38,076 t against 35,800 t in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Cambodia and Saudi Arabia?
- 2,276 t, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Saudi Arabia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Cambodia ranks 56th and Saudi Arabia ranks 59th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).