Cameroon vs Tajikistan: Input — Cropland phosphorus

Cameroon
17,247 t
in 2023
Tajikistan
16,548 t
in 2023
Cameroon rank
96th
Tajikistan rank
99th

Input — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Cameroon
  • Tajikistan
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 17,247 t against 16,548 t in Tajikistan, a difference of 699 t.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.

Cameroon ranks 96th and Tajikistan ranks 99th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 3 and Tajikistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s 8,781 t 16,515 t 7,733 t Tajikistan
2000s 12,241 t 11,388 t 852.57 t Cameroon
2010s 15,659 t 13,709 t 1,951 t Cameroon
2020s 17,190 t 16,807 t 383.65 t Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Cameroon or Tajikistan?
Cameroon, at 17,247 t against 16,548 t in Tajikistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Cameroon and Tajikistan?
699 t, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Tajikistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Tajikistan rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
Cameroon ranks 96th and Tajikistan ranks 99th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).