Caribbean vs Central Asia: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Caribbean
- Central Asia
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 282,935 t against 48,462 t in Caribbean, a difference of 234,473 t.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 5.8 times Caribbean's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Central Asia has been ahead every year.
Caribbean ranks 27th and Central Asia ranks 24th of 29 countries.
Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Central Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 64,350 t | 303,426 t | 239,075 t | Central Asia |
| 1970s | 68,787 t | 544,922 t | 476,135 t | Central Asia |
| 1980s | 73,031 t | 828,241 t | 755,210 t | Central Asia |
| 1990s | 57,638 t | 328,762 t | 271,124 t | Central Asia |
| 2000s | 50,508 t | 172,228 t | 121,720 t | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 63,944 t | 233,596 t | 169,652 t | Central Asia |
| 2020s | 49,151 t | 265,913 t | 216,762 t | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Caribbean or Central Asia?
- Central Asia, at 282,935 t against 48,462 t in Caribbean as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Caribbean and Central Asia?
- 234,473 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Central Asia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Central Asia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Caribbean ranks 27th and Central Asia ranks 24th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).