Central Asia vs Czechoslovakia: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Central Asia
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 282,935 t against 137,164 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 145,771 t.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 2.1 times Czechoslovakia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.
Central Asia ranks 24th and Czechoslovakia ranks 27th of 29 groups.
Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 303,426 t | 303,289 t | 136.89 t | Central Asia |
| 1970s | 544,922 t | 479,546 t | 65,376 t | Central Asia |
| 1980s | 828,241 t | 566,156 t | 262,085 t | Central Asia |
| 1990s | 610,544 t | 236,550 t | 373,993 t | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Central Asia or Czechoslovakia?
- Central Asia, at 282,935 t against 137,164 t in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Central Asia and Czechoslovakia?
- 145,771 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Central Asia and Czechoslovakia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Central Asia ranks 24th and Czechoslovakia ranks 27th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).