Central Asia vs Egypt: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Central Asia
- Egypt
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 282,935 t against 164,615 t in Egypt, a difference of 118,320 t.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 1.7 times Egypt's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Central Asia has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 26th and Egypt ranks 23rd of 32 groups.
Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 303,426 t | 22,378 t | 281,048 t | Central Asia |
| 1970s | 544,922 t | 33,998 t | 510,924 t | Central Asia |
| 1980s | 828,241 t | 75,776 t | 752,465 t | Central Asia |
| 1990s | 328,762 t | 64,235 t | 264,526 t | Central Asia |
| 2000s | 172,228 t | 81,681 t | 90,547 t | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 233,596 t | 108,461 t | 125,134 t | Central Asia |
| 2020s | 265,913 t | 146,162 t | 119,751 t | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Central Asia or Egypt?
- Central Asia, at 282,935 t against 164,615 t in Egypt as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Central Asia and Egypt?
- 118,320 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Egypt?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Egypt rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Central Asia ranks 26th and Egypt ranks 23rd of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).