Central Asia vs Japan: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Central Asia
- Japan
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 282,935 t against 146,879 t in Japan, a difference of 136,056 t.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 1.9 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.
Central Asia ranks 26th and Japan ranks 28th of 32 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 5 and Japan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 303,426 t | 280,801 t | 22,625 t | Central Asia |
| 1970s | 544,922 t | 356,462 t | 188,459 t | Central Asia |
| 1980s | 828,241 t | 370,905 t | 457,336 t | Central Asia |
| 1990s | 328,762 t | 333,786 t | 5,024 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 172,228 t | 247,933 t | 75,705 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 233,596 t | 199,192 t | 34,404 t | Central Asia |
| 2020s | 265,913 t | 168,061 t | 97,852 t | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Central Asia or Japan?
- Central Asia, at 282,935 t against 146,879 t in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Central Asia and Japan?
- 136,056 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Japan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Japan rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Central Asia ranks 26th and Japan ranks 28th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).