Chad vs Croatia: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Chad
- Croatia
How they compare
Chad currently reports 16,662 t against 15,628 t in Croatia, a difference of 1,034 t.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Chad ranks 89th and Croatia ranks 91st of 186 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,168 t | 24,822 t | 20,653 t | Croatia |
| 2000s | 6,181 t | 26,827 t | 20,647 t | Croatia |
| 2010s | 10,571 t | 19,888 t | 9,317 t | Croatia |
| 2020s | 15,176 t | 17,449 t | 2,273 t | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Chad or Croatia?
- Chad, at 16,662 t against 15,628 t in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Chad and Croatia?
- 1,034 t, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Croatia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Croatia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Chad ranks 89th and Croatia ranks 91st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).