Chile vs Malawi: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Chile
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 50,435 t against 46,348 t in Chile, a difference of 4,087 t.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 56th and Malawi ranks 54th of 201 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 23,594 t | 1,637 t | 21,958 t | Chile |
| 1970s | 29,885 t | 2,841 t | 27,044 t | Chile |
| 1980s | 33,997 t | 6,555 t | 27,442 t | Chile |
| 1990s | 55,392 t | 8,300 t | 47,092 t | Chile |
| 2000s | 61,794 t | 11,956 t | 49,839 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 56,546 t | 24,200 t | 32,345 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 50,252 t | 46,571 t | 3,680 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Chile or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 50,435 t against 46,348 t in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Chile and Malawi?
- 4,087 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malawi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Malawi rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Chile ranks 56th and Malawi ranks 54th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).