Colombia vs Ethiopia: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Colombia
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 157,443 t against 147,597 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 9,846 t.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 25th and Ethiopia ranks 27th of 201 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 98,701 t | 45,940 t | 52,761 t | Colombia |
| 2000s | 123,575 t | 52,283 t | 71,292 t | Colombia |
| 2010s | 151,468 t | 99,240 t | 52,228 t | Colombia |
| 2020s | 154,776 t | 142,408 t | 12,369 t | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Colombia or Ethiopia?
- Colombia, at 157,443 t against 147,597 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Colombia and Ethiopia?
- 9,846 t, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Ethiopia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Colombia ranks 25th and Ethiopia ranks 27th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).