Colombia vs Ukraine: Input — Cropland phosphorus

Colombia
157,443 t
in 2023
Ukraine
156,625 t
in 2023
Colombia rank
25th
Ukraine rank
26th

Input — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Colombia
  • Ukraine
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 157,443 t against 156,625 t in Ukraine, a difference of 818 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.

Colombia ranks 25th and Ukraine ranks 26th of 201 countries.

Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Ukraine Difference Ahead
1990s 97,258 t 291,579 t 194,321 t Ukraine
2000s 123,575 t 158,052 t 34,477 t Ukraine
2010s 151,468 t 218,487 t 67,019 t Ukraine
2020s 154,776 t 213,744 t 58,968 t Ukraine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Colombia or Ukraine?
Colombia, at 157,443 t against 156,625 t in Ukraine as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Colombia and Ukraine?
818 t, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Ukraine?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Ukraine rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
Colombia ranks 25th and Ukraine ranks 26th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).