Comoros vs Dominica: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Comoros
- Dominica
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 81.26 t against 76.4 t in Comoros, a difference of 4.86 t.
That makes Dominica's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Dominica has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 191st and Dominica ranks 189th of 201 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Dominica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 76.59 t | 605.11 t | 528.52 t | Dominica |
| 1970s | 81.04 t | 567.68 t | 486.64 t | Dominica |
| 1980s | 82.3 t | 429.52 t | 347.21 t | Dominica |
| 1990s | 85.42 t | 543.73 t | 458.31 t | Dominica |
| 2000s | 55.48 t | 263.88 t | 208.4 t | Dominica |
| 2010s | 49.08 t | 180.94 t | 131.86 t | Dominica |
| 2020s | 82.13 t | 130.02 t | 47.88 t | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Comoros or Dominica?
- Dominica, at 81.26 t against 76.4 t in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Comoros and Dominica?
- 4.86 t, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Dominica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Dominica rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Comoros ranks 191st and Dominica ranks 189th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).