Comoros vs Faroe Islands: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Comoros
- Faroe Islands
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 76.4 t against 50.2 t in Faroe Islands, a difference of 26.2 t.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.5 times Faroe Islands's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Faroe Islands ahead.
Comoros ranks 191st and Faroe Islands ranks 194th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and Faroe Islands in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Faroe Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 76.59 t | 162.85 t | 86.26 t | Faroe Islands |
| 1970s | 81.04 t | 158.68 t | 77.64 t | Faroe Islands |
| 1980s | 82.3 t | 156.59 t | 74.29 t | Faroe Islands |
| 1990s | 85.42 t | 158.12 t | 72.7 t | Faroe Islands |
| 2000s | 55.48 t | 135.96 t | 80.48 t | Faroe Islands |
| 2010s | 49.08 t | 63.96 t | 14.88 t | Faroe Islands |
| 2020s | 82.13 t | 48.64 t | 33.49 t | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Comoros or Faroe Islands?
- Comoros, at 76.4 t against 50.2 t in Faroe Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Comoros and Faroe Islands?
- 26.2 t, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Faroe Islands?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Faroe Islands rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Comoros ranks 191st and Faroe Islands ranks 194th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).