Costa Rica vs Cuba: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Costa Rica
- Cuba
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 14,253 t against 12,262 t in Cuba, a difference of 1,991 t.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 98th and Cuba ranks 101st of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,556 t | 44,643 t | 40,087 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 7,831 t | 37,272 t | 29,442 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 9,005 t | 46,876 t | 37,871 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 14,838 t | 27,214 t | 12,375 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 15,812 t | 18,195 t | 2,383 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 16,214 t | 19,664 t | 3,450 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 13,973 t | 11,006 t | 2,967 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Costa Rica or Cuba?
- Costa Rica, at 14,253 t against 12,262 t in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Costa Rica and Cuba?
- 1,991 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Cuba?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Cuba rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Costa Rica ranks 98th and Cuba ranks 101st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).