Costa Rica vs Mozambique: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Costa Rica
- Mozambique
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 14,253 t against 13,897 t in Mozambique, a difference of 356 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 108th and Mozambique ranks 109th of 201 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,556 t | 1,834 t | 2,721 t | Costa Rica |
| 1970s | 7,831 t | 3,443 t | 4,388 t | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 9,005 t | 5,680 t | 3,325 t | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 14,838 t | 6,893 t | 7,946 t | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 15,812 t | 8,707 t | 7,105 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 16,214 t | 9,595 t | 6,619 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 13,973 t | 12,706 t | 1,267 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Costa Rica or Mozambique?
- Costa Rica, at 14,253 t against 13,897 t in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Costa Rica and Mozambique?
- 356 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mozambique?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Mozambique rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Costa Rica ranks 108th and Mozambique ranks 109th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).