Côte d'Ivoire vs Czechia: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Czechia
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 34,291 t against 33,334 t in Czechia, a difference of 957 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 67th and Czechia ranks 69th of 201 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11,053 t | 54,038 t | 42,986 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 10,486 t | 44,319 t | 33,833 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 19,976 t | 39,218 t | 19,242 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 27,703 t | 33,874 t | 6,170 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Côte d'Ivoire or Czechia?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 34,291 t against 33,334 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Côte d'Ivoire and Czechia?
- 957 t, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Czechia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 67th and Czechia ranks 69th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).