Côte d'Ivoire vs Myanmar: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 120,995 t against 34,291 t in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 86,704 t.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 3.5 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 28th and Myanmar ranks 30th of 29 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,921 t | 34,631 t | 32,710 t | Myanmar |
| 1970s | 4,287 t | 46,205 t | 41,917 t | Myanmar |
| 1980s | 6,331 t | 67,563 t | 61,233 t | Myanmar |
| 1990s | 9,855 t | 68,144 t | 58,289 t | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 10,486 t | 81,386 t | 70,900 t | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 19,976 t | 130,576 t | 110,600 t | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 27,703 t | 120,132 t | 92,429 t | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Côte d'Ivoire or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 120,995 t against 34,291 t in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Côte d'Ivoire and Myanmar?
- 86,704 t, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Myanmar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Myanmar rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 28th and Myanmar ranks 30th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).