Côte d'Ivoire vs Zambia: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 34,459 t against 34,291 t in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 168 t.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 67th and Zambia ranks 66th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,921 t | 2,659 t | 738.81 t | Zambia |
| 1970s | 4,287 t | 7,460 t | 3,173 t | Zambia |
| 1980s | 6,331 t | 10,311 t | 3,980 t | Zambia |
| 1990s | 9,855 t | 8,934 t | 921.6 t | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2000s | 10,486 t | 8,009 t | 2,478 t | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 19,976 t | 20,670 t | 693.96 t | Zambia |
| 2020s | 27,703 t | 30,897 t | 3,194 t | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Côte d'Ivoire or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 34,459 t against 34,291 t in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Côte d'Ivoire and Zambia?
- 168 t, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Zambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Zambia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 67th and Zambia ranks 66th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).