Cuba vs Rwanda: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cuba
- Rwanda
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 12,262 t against 10,724 t in Rwanda, a difference of 1,538 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 112th and Rwanda ranks 115th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 44,643 t | 455.39 t | 44,187 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 37,272 t | 666.58 t | 36,606 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 46,876 t | 966.66 t | 45,909 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 27,214 t | 1,136 t | 26,078 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 18,195 t | 2,765 t | 15,431 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 19,664 t | 8,024 t | 11,640 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 11,006 t | 12,372 t | 1,366 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Cuba or Rwanda?
- Cuba, at 12,262 t against 10,724 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Cuba and Rwanda?
- 1,538 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Rwanda rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Cuba ranks 112th and Rwanda ranks 115th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).