Cuba vs Syrian Arab Republic: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cuba
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 12,981 t against 12,262 t in Cuba, a difference of 719 t.
That makes Syrian Arab Republic's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 112th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 110th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 5 and Syrian Arab Republic in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 44,643 t | 5,203 t | 39,440 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 37,272 t | 12,647 t | 24,625 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 46,876 t | 37,367 t | 9,509 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 27,214 t | 55,996 t | 28,782 t | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2000s | 18,195 t | 50,091 t | 31,896 t | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 19,664 t | 15,450 t | 4,214 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 11,006 t | 10,713 t | 292.26 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Cuba or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 12,981 t against 12,262 t in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Cuba and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 719 t, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Cuba ranks 112th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 110th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).