Czechia vs Ecuador: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Czechia
- Ecuador
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 33,334 t against 32,458 t in Ecuador, a difference of 876 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 69th and Ecuador ranks 71st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 3 and Ecuador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 54,038 t | 31,653 t | 22,385 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 44,319 t | 34,666 t | 9,654 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 39,218 t | 39,045 t | 172.61 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 33,874 t | 37,125 t | 3,252 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Czechia or Ecuador?
- Czechia, at 33,334 t against 32,458 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Czechia and Ecuador?
- 876 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Ecuador?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Ecuador rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Czechia ranks 69th and Ecuador ranks 71st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).