Czechia vs Turkmenistan: Input — Cropland phosphorus

Czechia
33,334 t
in 2023
Turkmenistan
33,136 t
in 2023
Czechia rank
69th
Turkmenistan rank
70th

Input — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Czechia
  • Turkmenistan
020.0k40.0k60.0k199220072023

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 33,334 t against 33,136 t in Turkmenistan, a difference of 198 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 69th and Turkmenistan ranks 70th of 201 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 54,038 t 14,378 t 39,660 t Czechia
2000s 44,319 t 16,284 t 28,035 t Czechia
2010s 39,218 t 24,887 t 14,331 t Czechia
2020s 33,874 t 32,145 t 1,729 t Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Czechia or Turkmenistan?
Czechia, at 33,334 t against 33,136 t in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Czechia and Turkmenistan?
198 t, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Turkmenistan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Turkmenistan rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
Czechia ranks 69th and Turkmenistan ranks 70th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).