Czechoslovakia vs Italy: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Italy
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 137,164 t against 134,861 t in Italy, a difference of 2,303 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Italy ahead.
Czechoslovakia ranks 29th and Italy ranks 30th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechoslovakia averaged higher in 3 and Italy in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 303,289 t | 272,794 t | 30,494 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 479,546 t | 340,843 t | 138,702 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 566,156 t | 397,127 t | 169,029 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 236,550 t | 363,312 t | 126,762 t | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Czechoslovakia or Italy?
- Czechoslovakia, at 137,164 t against 134,861 t in Italy as of 1992.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Czechoslovakia and Italy?
- 2,303 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Italy?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Italy rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 29th and Italy ranks 30th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).