Djibouti vs Guadeloupe: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Djibouti
- Guadeloupe
How they compare
Guadeloupe currently reports 163.93 t against 129.98 t in Djibouti, a difference of 33.95 t.
That makes Guadeloupe's figure about 1.3 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guadeloupe ahead.
Djibouti ranks 185th and Guadeloupe ranks 183rd of 201 countries.
Guadeloupe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Guadeloupe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 79.94 t | 1,038 t | 958.29 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1970s | 94.35 t | 1,363 t | 1,269 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1980s | 78.12 t | 1,364 t | 1,285 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1990s | 103.83 t | 1,162 t | 1,058 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2000s | 117.66 t | 707.42 t | 589.76 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2010s | 123.93 t | 134.93 t | 11 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2020s | 130.1 t | 158.81 t | 28.71 t | Guadeloupe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Djibouti or Guadeloupe?
- Guadeloupe, at 163.93 t against 129.98 t in Djibouti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Djibouti and Guadeloupe?
- 33.95 t, with Guadeloupe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Guadeloupe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Djibouti and Guadeloupe rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Djibouti ranks 185th and Guadeloupe ranks 183rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).