Djibouti vs Saint Lucia: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Djibouti
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 129.98 t against 122.55 t in Saint Lucia, a difference of 7.43 t.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.1 times Saint Lucia's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Djibouti ranks 185th and Saint Lucia ranks 186th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 79.94 t | 219.78 t | 139.84 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1970s | 94.35 t | 419.36 t | 325.01 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1980s | 78.12 t | 190.79 t | 112.67 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1990s | 103.83 t | 243.37 t | 139.54 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 117.66 t | 179.51 t | 61.85 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 123.93 t | 136.93 t | 13 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 130.1 t | 122.09 t | 8.01 t | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Djibouti or Saint Lucia?
- Djibouti, at 129.98 t against 122.55 t in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Djibouti and Saint Lucia?
- 7.43 t, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Saint Lucia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Djibouti and Saint Lucia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Djibouti ranks 185th and Saint Lucia ranks 186th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).