Dominica vs Kiribati: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Dominica
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 99.89 t against 81.26 t in Dominica, a difference of 18.63 t.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.2 times Dominica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominica ahead.
Dominica ranks 189th and Kiribati ranks 187th of 201 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 605.11 t | 38.65 t | 566.46 t | Dominica |
| 1970s | 567.68 t | 41.81 t | 525.88 t | Dominica |
| 1980s | 429.52 t | 46.11 t | 383.41 t | Dominica |
| 1990s | 543.73 t | 51.33 t | 492.4 t | Dominica |
| 2000s | 263.88 t | 76.75 t | 187.13 t | Dominica |
| 2010s | 180.94 t | 95.34 t | 85.6 t | Dominica |
| 2020s | 130.02 t | 99.38 t | 30.64 t | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Dominica or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 99.89 t against 81.26 t in Dominica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Dominica and Kiribati?
- 18.63 t, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Kiribati?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Kiribati rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Dominica ranks 189th and Kiribati ranks 187th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).