Dominican Republic vs Finland: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Dominican Republic
- Finland
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 21,849 t against 21,385 t in Finland, a difference of 464 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 90th and Finland ranks 91st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,949 t | 81,552 t | 76,604 t | Finland |
| 1970s | 11,924 t | 95,752 t | 83,828 t | Finland |
| 1980s | 10,649 t | 85,685 t | 75,036 t | Finland |
| 1990s | 15,346 t | 47,992 t | 32,646 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 16,863 t | 32,755 t | 15,892 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 23,695 t | 23,822 t | 127.01 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 23,255 t | 22,235 t | 1,020 t | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Dominican Republic or Finland?
- Dominican Republic, at 21,849 t against 21,385 t in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Dominican Republic and Finland?
- 464 t, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Finland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Finland rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Dominican Republic ranks 90th and Finland ranks 91st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).