Dominican Republic vs Sudan: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Dominican Republic
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 22,798 t against 21,849 t in Dominican Republic, a difference of 949 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 90th and Sudan ranks 88th of 201 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23,778 t | 24,761 t | 983.24 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 23,255 t | 24,864 t | 1,609 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Dominican Republic or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 22,798 t against 21,849 t in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Dominican Republic and Sudan?
- 949 t, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Sudan rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Dominican Republic ranks 90th and Sudan ranks 88th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).