Eastern Africa vs France: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Eastern Africa
- France
How they compare
Eastern Africa currently reports 485,158 t against 286,506 t in France, a difference of 198,652 t.
That makes Eastern Africa's figure about 1.7 times France's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was France ahead.
Eastern Africa ranks 20th and France ranks 18th of 32 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Eastern Africa averaged higher in 1 and France in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Africa | France | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 58,163 t | 726,686 t | 668,523 t | France |
| 1970s | 92,989 t | 971,079 t | 878,090 t | France |
| 1980s | 129,089 t | 843,986 t | 714,897 t | France |
| 1990s | 166,946 t | 642,426 t | 475,481 t | France |
| 2000s | 194,883 t | 452,555 t | 257,672 t | France |
| 2010s | 329,658 t | 366,733 t | 37,075 t | France |
| 2020s | 464,868 t | 315,674 t | 149,194 t | Eastern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Eastern Africa or France?
- Eastern Africa, at 485,158 t against 286,506 t in France as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Eastern Africa and France?
- 198,652 t, with Eastern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Africa and France?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Africa and France rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Eastern Africa ranks 20th and France ranks 18th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).