Eastern Asia vs Russian Federation: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Eastern Asia
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Eastern Asia currently reports 6.24 million t against 730,795 t in Russian Federation, a difference of 5.51 million t.
That makes Eastern Asia's figure about 8.5 times Russian Federation's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Eastern Asia has been ahead every year.
Eastern Asia ranks 4th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 32 groups.
Eastern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.20 million t | 761,400 t | 4.44 million t | Eastern Asia |
| 2000s | 6.24 million t | 500,712 t | 5.74 million t | Eastern Asia |
| 2010s | 7.24 million t | 586,435 t | 6.65 million t | Eastern Asia |
| 2020s | 6.33 million t | 729,896 t | 5.60 million t | Eastern Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Eastern Asia or Russian Federation?
- Eastern Asia, at 6.24 million t against 730,795 t in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Eastern Asia and Russian Federation?
- 5.51 million t, with Eastern Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Asia and Russian Federation rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Eastern Asia ranks 4th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).