Ecuador vs Turkmenistan: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ecuador
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 33,136 t against 32,458 t in Ecuador, a difference of 678 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Ecuador ranks 71st and Turkmenistan ranks 70th of 201 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31,177 t | 16,978 t | 14,199 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 34,666 t | 16,284 t | 18,382 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 39,045 t | 24,887 t | 14,158 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 37,125 t | 32,145 t | 4,980 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Ecuador or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 33,136 t against 32,458 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Ecuador and Turkmenistan?
- 678 t, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Turkmenistan rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Ecuador ranks 71st and Turkmenistan ranks 70th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).