Ecuador vs Zambia: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ecuador
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 34,459 t against 32,458 t in Ecuador, a difference of 2,001 t.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 64th and Zambia ranks 61st of 186 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 13,001 t | 2,659 t | 10,341 t | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 20,115 t | 7,460 t | 12,655 t | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 24,083 t | 10,311 t | 13,772 t | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 29,170 t | 8,934 t | 20,237 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 34,666 t | 8,009 t | 26,657 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 39,045 t | 20,670 t | 18,375 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 37,125 t | 30,897 t | 6,228 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Ecuador or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 34,459 t against 32,458 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Ecuador and Zambia?
- 2,001 t, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Zambia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Ecuador ranks 64th and Zambia ranks 61st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).