Egypt vs Micronesia (Federated States of): Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Egypt
- Micronesia (Federated States of)
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 164,615 t against 155.31 t in Micronesia (Federated States of), a difference of 164,460 t.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1,059.9 times Micronesia (Federated States of)'s.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 21st and Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 18th of 186 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Micronesia (Federated States of) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 61,836 t | 125.72 t | 61,711 t | Egypt |
| 2000s | 81,681 t | 128.22 t | 81,553 t | Egypt |
| 2010s | 108,461 t | 142.81 t | 108,319 t | Egypt |
| 2020s | 146,162 t | 152.33 t | 146,010 t | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Egypt or Micronesia (Federated States of)?
- Egypt, at 164,615 t against 155.31 t in Micronesia (Federated States of) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Egypt and Micronesia (Federated States of)?
- 164,460 t, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Micronesia (Federated States of)?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Micronesia (Federated States of) rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Egypt ranks 21st and Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 18th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).